The lowest tender rarely delivers the best value.
A cheaper system might look attractive at award stage, but it often requires earlier re-coating, carries limited warranty protection, increases the frequency of patch repairs and drives higher reactive maintenance costs. What appears economical on day one can become expensive within a few winters.
Car parks are revenue-generating assets. When areas are closed for remedial works, the cost isn’t just in materials and labour — it’s in lost income and disruption. That’s why budgeting needs to look beyond installation and consider performance over time.
Thinking five, ten or fifteen years ahead changes the equation. Initial capital spend must be weighed against maintenance cycles, durability expectations and realistic lifecycle projections. When those factors are assessed properly, the conversation shifts from cheapest option to most sustainable solution.
Refurbishment should reduce long-term liability and stabilise maintenance planning — not simply defer problems to a later date.
